SARS Intensifies Trust Scrutiny—Are Your Trustees Prepared?

The South African Revenue Service (SARS) has fundamentally changed the compliance landscape for all trusts. The latest revisions to the ITR12T (Trust Income Tax Return) and related legislation signal that SARS is moving toward full transparency, demanding granular detail on trust structures, distributions, and beneficiaries.

Trustees can no longer afford a passive approach; non-compliance is being flagged faster than ever, leading to immediate audits and severe penalties.

  1. New Compliance Cornerstone: The IT3(t) Data Mandate

The IT3(t) (Third-Party Data Return for Trusts) is now the most critical piece of the trust compliance puzzle, moving from an administrative task to a mandatory compliance check integrated directly into the tax return.

  • ITR12T Integration: The Trust Income Tax Return (ITR12T) now includes a mandatory confirmation question: “Did the Trust submit an IT3(t) return?” Failure to confirm submission will halt the filing process and trigger a non-compliance flag.
  • Automated Cross-Validation: SARS uses the IT3(t) data—which reports all amounts vested in beneficiaries (income, capital gains, and capital)—to directly pre-populate beneficiaries’ individual tax returns.
  • The Mismatch Risk: Any discrepancy between the amounts reported by the trust on the IT3(t) and the amounts declared by the beneficiary will be instantly visible to SARS’ automated systems, virtually guaranteeing an audit or investigation.
  1. Full Transparency: The Beneficial Ownership Disclosure

In line with international Financial Action Task Force (FATF) requirements, SARS is aggressively enforcing beneficial ownership (BO) disclosure to combat illicit financial flows.

  • Mandatory Detail: Trustees must provide extensive personal details, including the South African ID number, for every natural person who qualifies as a Beneficial Owner.
  • Broad Definition: A BO includes the Founder/Settlor, all Trustees, and all Identifiable Beneficiaries (even those who have not yet received a benefit).
  • Supporting Documents Required: The ITR12T mandates the upload of documents (such as an organogram or spreadsheet) that clearly depict the BO structure and control hierarchy.
  • Trustee Liability: Non-disclosure of BO information to both SARS and the Master of the High Court can lead to significant financial penalties and potential criminal sanctions for the trustees personally.
  1. Legislative Updates Restricting Tax Planning

Recent legislative changes have further tightened the net, targeting structures that previously offered tax efficiencies.

  1. Restriction on Flow-Through for Non-Residents

The long-standing flow-through principle, where income distributed to a beneficiary retains its nature, is now limited to South African resident beneficiaries only.

  • Impact: Income and capital gains vested in non-resident beneficiaries are now taxed within the trust itself at the highest flat rates (45% for income; 36% effective rate for capital gains).
  • Compliance Need: Trusts with non-resident beneficiaries must ensure they meet all provisional tax obligations and re-evaluate their distribution strategies.
  1. Attribution Rules and Minor Beneficiaries

The Donor Attribution Rules (Section 7 and Paragraph 69) remain a high-risk area.

  • Risk: Income or capital gains stemming from assets donated by a parent to a trust that are vested in their minor child are attributed back to the parent and taxed at the parent’s marginal rate.
  • The Cross-Check: The integration of the IT3(t) makes it simple for SARS to cross-check distributions to minors against the parent’s tax return, instantly highlighting any failures to apply these complex attribution calculations.

Immediate Action for Trustees

The time for a reactive approach is over. Trustees must proactively ensure their trust administration is watertight to avoid triggering a SARS audit.

  1. Verify Beneficial Ownership: Ensure all BO details are current, accurate, and fully documented before filing.
  2. Align IT3(t) and ITR12T: Confirm that the vesting decisions and amounts reported on the IT3(t) are 100% consistent with the ITR12T and the beneficiaries’ expected tax declarations.

Review Distribution Strategy: If the trust has non-resident beneficiaries or distributes to minors, urgently review the strategy to ensure compliance with the new limitations and the strict attribution rules.

URGENT WARNING: The Catastrophic Impact of CIPC FINAL Deregistration

A company’s failure to maintain its statutory compliance, primarily the filing of Annual Returns for two or more successive years, triggers an administrative process that leads to the complete and immediate withdrawal of its legal status by the Companies and Intellectual Property Commission (CIPC).

The status of “Final Deregistered” is not merely a formality—it is a catastrophic event that instantly strips the business of its legal identity and triggers severe financial and legal liabilities.

  1. The Immediate Loss of Legal Personality

Final deregistration under the Companies Act (No. 71 of 2008, Section 82(3)) has immediate and devastating legal consequences:

  • Cessation of Existence: The company or close corporation (CC) is removed from the CIPC register and legally ceases to exist as a separate juristic person (CIPC).
  • Invalid Contracts: Any contracts, agreements, or transactions entered into by the company after the final deregistration date may be deemed void (CIPC). This exposes the directors to risk and can lead to financial losses with clients and suppliers.
  • Frozen Banking: Financial institutions (banks) are notified and typically freeze the company’s bank accounts, immediately halting operations and cash flow (CIPC).
  1. Assets are Forfeited to the State (Bona Vacantia)

This is arguably the most severe financial consequence for the business:

  • Forfeiture of Assets: All the company’s assets—including immovable property (land, buildings), bank balances, and intellectual property—are automatically transferred to the State as bona vacantia (ownerless goods) (CIPC).
  • Loss of Creditor Enforcement: While a company’s debt is not extinguished by deregistration, creditors lose the immediate ability to enforce those debts against the now-non-existent entity (CIPC).
  1. Personal Liability for Directors and Members

Deregistration does not end the liability of the individuals who governed the entity.

  • Continuing Liability: The liability of any former director or member for any act or omission that took place before deregistration is unaffected and continues (CIPC).
  • Reckless Trading Risk: Directors who knowingly allowed the company to trade or accrue debt while non-compliant or undergoing deregistration risk being held personally liable for the company’s debts (CIPC). This can also extend to common law actions for reckless or fraudulent trading.
  • Notification Failure: The CIPC sends warnings to the registered contact details of directors/members. Failure to receive these due to outdated contact information is the responsibility of the director, not the Commission (CIPC).

Reinstatement: An Expensive and Uncertain Process

While reinstatement is possible, it is not guaranteed and requires a significant administrative effort.

Reinstatement Requirement Practical Impact
Proof of Economic Value The company must provide sufficient documentary proof (e.g., bank statements covering a period before and after deregistration) that it was in business or had assets at the time of final deregistration (CIPC).
Clearance of Backlog All outstanding Annual Returns, associated fees, penalties, and the latest Beneficial Ownership (BO) declaration must be filed and paid (CIPC).
Process Length & Cost The process is complex, involves a dedicated application (Form CoR 40.5), a non-refundable application fee (R200.00 as of the latest guide), and is time-consuming (CIPC).

 

CRITICAL NOTE: If a company was not in business or held no economic value at the time of final deregistration, CIPC will reject the reinstatement application. The only recourse is to register a new entity (CIPC).

Directors and business owners must check their status on the CIPC register immediately and resolve all Annual Return and Beneficial Ownership arrears to prevent the catastrophic event of final deregistration.

Navigating the New Landscape: VAT on Low-Value Imported Goods in South Africa

The South African Revenue Service (SARS) has been steadily reforming its customs import system for e-commerce, and recent changes, particularly concerning Value-Added Tax (VAT) on low-value imported goods, are set to significantly impact businesses across the country. These amendments are driven by SARS’s commitment to fostering fair competition and ensuring legitimate trade within the rapidly growing e-commerce sector.

The Key Change: No More VAT-Free Low-Value Imports

Historically, a concession existed where certain imported goods valued at less than ZAR 500 were exempt from VAT, and a flat rate of 20% was applied in lieu of Customs duties. This effectively created a loophole that favoured foreign e-commerce sellers, allowing them to bring low-value parcels into South Africa without the standard 15% VAT that local businesses are required to charge.

SARS has officially closed this loophole.

  • Interim Implementation (from 1 September 2024): SARS began implementing changes whereby VAT was introduced in addition to the 20% flat rate Customs duty for these low-value consignments. This marked the practical end of the VAT exemption.
  • Formalisation and Reconfiguration (from 1 November 2024): The customs system was further reconfigured to align with the World Customs Organization’s (WCO) Guidelines on Immediate Release.2 This involves categorising goods for duty purposes into distinct categories, ensuring appropriate duties are applied alongside the now-standard 15% import VAT on all goods, regardless of their value.
  • Legislative Finalisation: While SARS has implemented these changes through Customs directives, the formal legislative amendments to the VAT Act to permanently remove the de minimis threshold will be tabled in upcoming tax bills for parliamentary approval, solidifying these changes into law.

In essence, all imported goods, even those of low value, are now subject to the standard 15% import VAT.

How Local Businesses and SMEs Will Be Affected

These changes bring both opportunities and challenges, particularly for South African small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) and other local businesses.

For Local Retailers and Manufacturers (Selling Locally Sourced Goods):

This is largely good news for businesses that primarily source and sell goods within South Africa.

  • Level Playing Field: The most significant benefit is the creation of a more equitable competitive environment. Local businesses have long argued that they were unfairly disadvantaged by foreign e-commerce platforms that could offer goods at lower prices because their imports were VAT-exempt. With VAT now uniformly applied to all imports, local businesses can compete on a more level playing field, potentially seeing an increase in local demand.
  • Increased Consumer Confidence in Local Products: As the price differential narrows, consumers may be more inclined to support local businesses, knowing that the price reflects a fairer tax application across the board.

For E-commerce Entrepreneurs and Small Businesses (Importing Goods for Resale):

These businesses will experience the most direct and immediate impact.

  • Increased Landed Costs: The cost of importing goods, particularly those previously benefiting from the ZAR 500 exemption, will increase by the 15% import VAT, in addition to any applicable customs duties and handling fees. This directly impacts your cost of goods sold.
  • Pricing Strategy Adjustments: Businesses will need to review and likely adjust their retail pricing strategies. You will need to decide whether to absorb some of these increased costs, pass them entirely to the consumer, or find a balance. Clear communication with customers about these new costs (e.g., in product listings or checkout) will be crucial.
  • Enhanced Administrative Burden: While SARS aims for a simplified clearance system, managing and reconciling the 15% import VAT on potentially numerous small consignments will add an administrative layer. Businesses need robust financial systems to track these costs accurately for tax purposes and cash flow management.
  • Supply Chain Review: It may be an opportune time for importing SMEs to review their supply chains. Are there local alternatives that are now more competitive? Can bulk imports reduce per-unit costs and administrative overheads, even with the new VAT?
  • Cash Flow Implications: Paying 15% VAT upfront on all imports will impact cash flow. Businesses need to plan for this increased outlay, especially for high-volume imports.

Navigating the New Terrain

These changes underscore the importance of accurate financial planning and robust accounting practices. Businesses, especially SMEs, should:

  • Review your product costing models to accurately account for the new import VAT.
  • Engage with your logistics and customs clearing agents to understand their updated processes and any new fees.
  • Communicate transparently with your customers about any necessary price adjustments.
  • Consult with a financial advisor or chartered accountant to ensure full compliance and to strategically assess the impact on your business’s profitability and cash flow.

SARS’s actions are a clear signal of its intent to modernise the tax system for the digital economy. While challenging for some, these changes ultimately aim to create a more equitable and sustainable trading environment for all businesses in South Africa.